by Jeffrey C Kadlowec, Architect
Abstract
This paper is a brief investigation of the many elements of sustainable construction from the urban planning and building design through rating systems, carbon footprint, circular economics and public policy. It is intended to serve as an overview of a complex topic that has become a critical step in environmental management and future development. With increase expansion of the human population and concentrations of people toward urban centers, the negative impact on ecological systems has become more apparent. Further efforts must be made to ensure the next generations will enjoy the same or better quality of life as previous ones. By increasing awareness, creating policies, and enforcing regulations, we can provide a wealthy and inclusive society motived by avoiding the short-sighted methods of the past while focused on economic progress through long-term thinking. The world is at the precipice of revolutionary changes; with greater awareness and involvement, global leadership must guide humanity in the proper direction—not by threat or force, but by fostering a paradigm shift towards a better tomorrow and beyond.
Keywords: Urban Planning, Building Design, Sustainable Construction, Carbon Footprint, Rating Systems, Circular Economics, and Public Policy
Introduction
Environmental preservation and resource conservation are a topic of global across multiple industries, especially in manufacturing and construction. The construction sector alone generates carbon emissions and creates various pollutants. It requires vast manpower, consumes materials, water and energy, and causes environmental degradation, while urban development and infrastructure are a necessity of modern economies (Chamria 2023). Green building has therefore become an essential component for sustainable and environmentally friendly development to reduce waste over the lifecycle of structures and facilities. Adoption of sustainable design practices is crucial in controlling greenhouse gas emission and limiting global warming.
Design thinking is an approach focused on value creation through innovation and development. It can be defined by a systematic problem-solving process and the application of collaboration and reasoning, relying on experimentation and iteration while considering alternative, in response to complex situations (Kumar 2023). By prioritizing the needs, experiences and preferences of end users, the design process aligns better than with traditional customer-oriented marketing. The world should be imagined from the various perspectives of clients, colleagues, customers, and users. By considering the potential harm at different levels through implementation and governance, responsible and ethical principles can be established for the benefit of society.
The construction sector consumes 40% of energy production, 40% of raw materials, 25% of timber, and 16% of water while accounting for 30% of greenhouse gas emissions. Life cycle analysis of building reveals that 85–95% of energy usage and carbon production occurs in operations (Walaa 2025). This demand is associated with heating, cooling, ventilation, and hot water that require electricity, natural gas, oil, and coal. Embodied energy, which includes energy used from creation to demolition, must also be considered along with indirect energy for material extraction, component manufacturing, and transportation to site. Climate change, resource depletion, and rapid urbanization are exacerbating these challenges and require an urgent paradigm shift towards sustainable development. Green architecture has emerged as a strategic framework for tangible and scalable design through holistic and multifaceted criteria.
Urban Planning
Building information modeling (BIM) provided a platform for coordination, collaboration and management of data within the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. This digital technology, process and policy for design offers an interactive framework throughout a building lifecycle (Li 2024). Benefits including reduction in time, cost, errors, omissions, rework, and risk, while still increasing productivity. Through the implementation of emerging artificial intelligence (AI) further gains in sustainability can be made in design, construction, operation, maintenance, and demolition. By applying research in machine learning, pattern recognition, intelligent control, game theory, and robotics through development of the internet, positive transformation are occurring in the architectural practice, enhanced education, improved health, and local communities. Integration of 5G data, virtual reality (VR), and biometric sensors will further advance sustainable development.
Integrating energy, economic and social factors bridges gaps between building rehabilitation and urban regeneration by leveraging public data. By providing actionable insight to governing authorities, housing agencies, urban planners, service providers, and research institutions, renovation initiatives with transformation goals and climate objectives can be examined, designed and simulated. Transparent and informed decisions can be made through a scalable structure across diverse geopolitical arenas (Madrazo 2025). Data availability remains the critical factor in the accuracy and depth of this type of analysis, and more detailed, case-specific datasets significantly enhance analytical capacity.
Transition to sustainable and resilient energy is reshaping building design and operations, urban communities, and distribution infrastructure. The importance of local microgrids is increasing through the integration of renewable energy sources in residential properties, commercial structures, and building complexes—transforming power grids of the energy sector (Ożadowicz 2025). Advances in renewable energy generation, storage and infrastructure and improvements in flexibility, efficiency and resilience bring unprecedented opportunities, though coordination and scaling comes with significant complexities. Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a catalyst for transformation through optimization, forecasting and adaptability. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost have become an integral part of energy management.
Urban heat island effect poses a major concern against public health and well-being in warmer climates. Building density, reduced vegetation, and heat emission make cities particularly vulnerable. Air temperatures in urban centers can rise up to 10° C due to waste heat generation, reduced evapotranspiration, and low-albedo materials (Zhao 2026). Air pollution, heat exposure, and extreme weather present additional risks to the public. Green infrastructure— parks, trees and vegetation—is one effective approach to mitigating the impact by providing shade, evapotranspiration and microclimates. The cooling potential of urban green varies by distribution, plant characteristics, and integration with the built environment. Modeling and simulation provide quantitative evaluation for optimize scenarios of urban regeneration to enhance comfort, reduce overheating, and improving environmental quality.
The green building trend seeks to minimize negative impacts to the environment over the entire lifecycle of projects through resource efficiency, by minimizing waste, improving indoor quality, adopting sustainable materials, and reducing total costs. These practices are essential components of urban planning and resilient infrastructure to stimulate economies, improve society, and mitigate environment (AbdelHaffez 2025). Numerous certification systems have been developed worldwide to assess structures, define criteria, apply weights, and certify buildings. Potential risks and uncertainties are often overlooked in a project lifecycle that hinder progress towards those key objectives. Integrating principles from risk management is therefore vital to ensure sustainability is achieved while addressing issues of time, cost, quality, and safety.
Building Design
There has been unprecedented progress in technology since the beginning of this century presenting increasing challenges in consumerism and energy demand while requiring efforts to address problems caused by environmental pollution and climate change (Piętocha 2026). Environmental footprint measures the impact of human activity on the global ecosystem, expressed in carbon units. Sustainable design, renewable energy, and circular economics have been recognized as critical financial and political factors of urban development. Through corporate social responsibility, companies are an influential driver of positive change worldwide. Rapid urbanization has led to a growing number of mid-rise and high-rise buildings which require specific structural, energy and climatic solutions. Passive strategies, active systems, and renewable integration remain underutilized features due to economic, spatial and functional constraints.
Building operation and maintenance is becoming increasingly digitized, enabling for data collection and advanced analysis. Growing use of building information modeling (BIM) integrates facility management into the project life cycle to provide a dynamic three-dimensional (3D) representation of technical conditions. Periodic reports, technical inspections, and maintenance documentation can be generated automatically to aid in the decision-making process, though still subject to the subjective experience of engineers, technicians and inspectors. Application of machine learning (ML) and AI can be utilized to develop Decision Support Systems (DSS), then integrated by managers, stakeholders and investors for predicting outcomes and reducing risks through regression algorithms.
Human survival and societal development rely heavily on energy and resources with current shortages and environmental issues become more relevant and apparent. To improve efficiency, save energy, and reduce pollution, global agencies are under extreme pressure to resolve conflicts, meet demands, and promote transition to renewable and sustainable practices (Pang 2025). Construction specifications in rural residential buildings differ substantially from commercial urban structures. Net-zero energy buildings offering further opportunities for energy conservation and emission reduction as one potential solution to create dynamic equilibrium between consumption and generation (see Fig 1).
Figure 1. The Structure of the Integrated Energy System (Pang 2025)
To address energy shortages and achieve carbon peaking/neutrality, this study develops a distributed renewable-based integrated energy system (IES) for rural active zero-energy buildings (ZEBs). Energy consumption patterns of typical rural houses are analyzed, guiding the design of a resource-tailored IES that balances economy and sustainability. Key equipment capacities are optimized to achieve net-zero/zero energy consumption targets. For typical daily cooling/heating/power loads, equipment output is scheduled using a dual-objective optimization model minimizing operating costs and CO2 emissions. Results demonstrate that: (1) Net-zero-energy IES outperforms separated production (SP) and full electrification systems (FES) in economic-environmental benefits; (2) Zero-energy IES significantly reduces rural building carbon emissions. The proposed system offers substantial practical value for China’s rural energy transition.
Sustainable Construction
Sustainable construction is a practical approach to designing and building residential units and commercial spaces are in harmony with nature through the efficient use of materials and resources (Zajemska 2025). It is believed that economic needs can be satisfied while simultaneously providing for the public, promoting health and well-being, and protecting the environment through energy efficiency, material selection, green technology, and reduces water consumption. The pursuit of these objectives and the long-term benefits must be considered at every stage of development from design, through construction, operation and maintenance, to adaptive reused or demolition. Ecological factors include renewable energy, electric charging, rainwater collection, extensive vegetation, light-colored materials, and LED lighting. Indoor quality involves thermal and acoustic comfort, proper ventilation, low volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and access to daylight. Technical professionals, organizational strategists, policy makers, and entrepreneurs should incorporate these principles and promote their value to all stakeholders including investors, financiers, insurance companies, regulatory agencies, material and equipment suppliers, and the greater community at large.
Material selection is essential component of sustainable construction while being a substantial obstacle. The complex process involves many criteria including cost, durability, construction specifications, and environmental impact with increasing concerns over finite resources, energy production, and the pollution generated (Yagmour 2025). Multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) can be utilized to manage these factors by analyzing benefits and evaluating trade-offs. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) uses economic, social and environmental indicators to determine the sustainable performance of building materials, products and equipment. Technological advancements in AI and the internet of things (IoT) provides greater depth in data and powerful frameworks for computation.
Despite global efforts, the construction sector leads in global waste production and contributes 40% of total GHG emissions (Sahebzamani 2026). Circular economy (CE) models offer potential solutions to those challenges by promoting leasing, sharing, repair, reuse, refurbishing, and recycling of current real estate, building materials, consumer products, and industrial byproducts. Though CE is primarily focused on environmental aspects, the intersection with societal and economic factors make it a transformative response for sustainable development. BIM already plays a pivotal role throughout the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, with virtual reality (VR) technology offering further engagement of stakeholders through interactive and immersive experiences. CE evolved from the ‘reduce, reuse, recycle’ (3Rs) method to extend traditional ‘cradle to grave’ life cycles towards a longer lifespan of resources and keeps materials in continuous use.
Environmental impact of the building sector is an emerging concern in that it makes up a significant portion of energy consumption and carbon emissions due to continuous growth of the global economy (Yang 2026). In developing countries experiencing rapid urbanization, these issues have become more pronounced and must be strategically addressed. Rural revitalization policies have made significant advances in poverty alleviation, food security, and sustainable development, though large-scale construction has disrupted original ecology—creating other complex issues and greater challenges. Region-specific carbon coefficients and a more comprehensive LCA will improve accuracy of quantitative performance assessment; combined with on-site monitoring and digital simulations could provide evaluation of the effectiveness and limitations for transformative processes.
Rating Systems
Green buildings are defined by execution and performance through six phases from planning to demolition including maintenance and renovation (Yousif 2025). Sustainability is measured through a series of indicators and the total environmental impact. Verifying and evaluating the industry as a whole can be completed through in-depth analysis, assessment measures, and comparative review. Several rating systems are currently in use worldwide based on regional characteristic with specific methods developed for data collection and weighted assessment of significant factors. These systems were established as guidelines to minimize environmental impact of buildings and infrastructure while providing a framework to improve performance, conserve energy and resource, and promote better integration with surrounding communities.
As urbanization continues, enhances approaches to sustainability development must be established and promoted. There are currently over 600 green building rating systems (GBRS) worldwide—most are voluntary, third-party standards (Kiss 2025). Energy efficiency and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) are the top evaluation criteria, encouraging social and environmental sustainability. GBRS should involve ecologist early in design to evaluate the ecological significance of a project site and obtain the advices of specialists regarding complex or sensitive features. Policy makers and regulatory agencies can mandate framework for sustainable development through informed decisions and expert opinions. Convey this information to residents and the public encourages positive engagement. Monitoring of sustainability criteria then becomes vital to long-term success in ecological preservation and biodiversity conservation.
Carbon Footprint
Mitigating climate change due to human activities requires a reduction of GHGs accumulating in the atmosphere with the building sector accounting for approximately 40% of global emissions (Torabi 2026). Carbon emissions consists of primarily of embodied carbon (EC) and operational carbon (OC). The first includes extraction, production, manufacturing, transportation, and construction; the latter results from energy consumption during operation. Grid decarbonization, energy efficiency efforts, and improved building systems have decreased OC, leaving EC as a factor with the most potential. New construction is projected to double the total built area over the next four decades. Once constructed, EC will already have been emitted, though the impact OC must be expected for several decades or even centuries. Carbon footprint should be calculated in early design phases through an LCA framework (see Fig 2).
Figure 2. Comparison of LCA Impact by Design Phase (Min 2026)
Reducing energy demand can be achieved through carbon neutrality and sustainable development. Over 70% of global emissions comes from the energy sector through the production of heat and electricity with half attributable to buildings (Min 2026). Eliminating unnecessary heating and cooling loads, and minimizing indoor/outdoor heat exchange would reduce energy consumption substantial—critical design strategies in architecture, engineering and urban development. Mechanical systems, exterior insulation, and equipment performance are the primary considerations in energy efficiency; though structural form, building massing, envelope exposure, and overall layout are often overlooked factors. System-related components can be replaced or enhanced throughout the life cycle, while the geometric component remains essential fixed to the original building form.
The Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI) evaluates the adaptability of a building in operation to meet occupant needs, optimize performance, and interact with networks. Unlike Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) focused on static energy efficiency, the SRI allows for flexibility, digitalization, and smart control (Gugliandolo 2026). BIM, dynamic energy modeling, data-driven monitoring, and automated systems provide new opportunities for practical and scientific pathways to decarbonization. With the evolution of smart buildings, more attention is required regarding the research, methodology and limitations of SRI, though it has emerged as an innovative and complementary tool compared to EPC.
Circular Economics
Application of circular economy (CE) in building renovation offers a means to reduce embodied emissions while maximizing material efficiency to achieve carbon neutrality. Though a fairly recent concept, CE is gaining momentum through policy changes and practical implementation to avoid legacy waste (Lucas 2025). Incorporating CE into GBRS is critical its standardization and will create an effective framework for building sustainability. The principles of ReSOLVE (Regenerate, Share, Optimize, Loop, Virtualize, and Exchange) was developed and now recognized as a prominent method for competitive CE and operational tool for translating principles into action: 1) prioritize restoring and regenerating natural capital, 2) maximize asset utilization through collaboration, 3) improve efficiency, reduce consumption, reverse logistics, and durable materials, 4) minimize material waste, close the material loop, and recover material value, 5) dematerialization through digital technology and virtual products or services, and 6) exchange traditional methods for alternate renewable ones (see Table 1).
Table 1. ReSOLVE framework for Circularity in the Built Environment (Lucas 2025)
Fossil fuel dependency has created excessive carbon pollution and threatens energy security worldwide. Renewable energy is pure and limitless, offering the best option to combat global warming and improve energy security. Renewable energy consumption (REC) has therefore become the best option to address these challenges (Gao 2026). There exists a moral responsibility and ethical obligation to ensure that each generation protects the environment for every future one. Transitioning from conventional energy to clean green sources is an essential way to achieve that goal. The carelessness of political agencies and failures in eco-friend practices by corporations remain major hurdles towards sustainable development regardless of the economic and environmental advantages. Fully understanding the positive impact of REC is paramount to meeting global demands, addressing environmental concerns, and guaranteeing energy security.
Public Policy
Green buildings and urban greening initiatives enhance social progress and urban ecological systems through integration of sustainable practices and natural elements. These architectural design features contribute to the aesthetic character of the built environment while creating habitants, supporting biodiversity, and augmenting urban oases (Lin 2025). It is crucial that modern cities be pleasant places to live, work and play—making green design an essential component of urban planning. The United Nations (UN) Environment Program describes goals and strategies to improve urban development in the Global Action Plan for Green Buildings. Areas of low economic development are significantly underdeveloped due to financial and technological constraints. Geography also limits implementation and adoption of sustainable design, resulting in regional disparity. Governmental policies can foster green development by advocating for energy efficiency, green technology, sustainable materials, and renewable energy. That approach has substantially improved construction and operations while decreasing environmental impact.
The static models of Climate Policy Uncertainty (CPU) and REC overlook the time-varying nature of green initiatives and energy transition. Grange causality tests can close that gap by offer new evidence on the dynamic risk associated with renewable energy transition and sustainable urban development (Zheng 2026). Policy diversity, public participation, and alignment of interests shapes social and economic aspects of climate governance. Global carbon emission reduction has become a major influencer of national politics and international commerce requiring greater attention and further regulation. Policymakers in the pursuit of climate leadership must proceed cautiously to avoid sacrificing domestic support for national policies.
Conclusion
Progress towards sustainable buildings in developed and developing countries varies significantly design global initiatives. Trends in the United States and UK have substantial increased over the past twenty years, though developing countries struggle to improve practices with slow progress in sustainability (Atmoko 2025). Policy framework, innovation strategies, management innovation information, transparency, and accountability vary by country. Design practices can also differ between private buildings and the public sector, mainly in profit orientation, facility management and building performance. Governmental leadership must therefore emphasize on the importance of developing and implementing sustainable policies to encourage and stimulate the private sector through standards and regulations while providing examples and guidelines in public buildings.
References
AbdelHaffez, Ahmed; Kaloop, Mosbeh; Eldessouki, Mohamed & Issa, Usama. (2025). Identification and Assessment of Risk Factors in Green Building Projects: A Multi-Dimensional Approach for Sustainable Infrastructure. Sustainability, 17: 10178. doi.org/10.3390/su172210178.
Ahmed, Mazharuddin & Masood, Rehan. (2025). Assessment of Sustainable Building Design with Green Star Rating Using BIM. Energies, 18: 3994. doi.org/10.3390/en18153994.
Ahmed, Mukhtar & Chatpattananan, Vuttichai. (2026). Empowering Sustainable Project Success in Construction: The Strategic Role of Green HRM and Green Human Capital Through Green Construction Practices and GreenWork Climate. Sustainability, 18: 3933. doi.org/10.3390/su18083933.
Atmoko, Darmawan; Susilawati, Connie; Devi, Bernadetta; Wilkinson, Sara; Puspitarini, Intan; Lukito, Jose & Goonetilleke, Ashantha. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities for Promoting Sustainability in Public Buildings. Sustainability, 17: 403. doi.org/10.3390/su17020403.
Chamria, Harsh; Singhania, Shubham & Sardana, Varda. (2023). Sustainable Development through Green Building: A Holistic Exploration. Journal of Management & Public Policy, 15(1): 45-60. doi.org/10.47914/jmpp.2023.v15i1.004.
Gao, Yannan; Hafeez, Muhammad; Kouki, Fadoua; Sher, Falak & Akbar, Muhammad. (2026). Unraveling the impact of financial stress and trade policy uncertainty on advancing renewable energy transition in the USA. Energy & Environment, 37(3): 1370–1395. DOI: 10.1177/0958305X241262504.
Gugliandolo, Alessandra; La Notte, Luca; Palma, Alessandro & Di Pietra, Biagio. (2026). The Smart Readiness Indicator as a Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Building Decarbonisation and Digitalisation Governance. Sustainability, 18: 1532. doi.org/10.3390/su18031532.
Kiss, Bethany; Visintin, Casey; Garrard, Georgia & Bekessy, Sarah. (2025). Evaluating Biodiversity Criteria in Green Building Rating Schemes: Toward ‘Nature Positive’ Development. Sustainable Development, 33: 4884–4895. doi.org/10.1002/sd.3369.
Kumar, Minu; Micheli, Pietro; Singh, Jatinder Jit & Goldberg, Neil. (2023). Responsible Design Thinking. Journal of Marketing, 1-26. DOI: 10.1177/00222429251396423.
Li, Jinyi; Liu, Zhen; Han, Guizhong; Demian, Peter & Osmani, Mohamed. (2024). The Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) Technologies for Sustainable Building in the Context of Smart Cities. Sustainability, 16: 10848. doi.org/10.3390/su162410848.
Li, Li; Yang, Xuesong; Liu, Sijia & Deng, Feiyang. (2026). AI‑Enabled Sustainable Landscape Design: A Decision‑Support Framework Based on “Generative‑Critical” Multi‑Agent. Urban Science, 10: 56. doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10010056.
Lin, Hua-Chun; Cheng, Kuo-Tai; Li, Wen-Han; Liu, Lin & Tai, Hsing-Wei. (2025). From Policy to Practice: A Systems Approach to Green Building Advancement for Regional Sustainability. Sustainability, 17: 10357. doi.org/10.3390/su172210357.
Lucas, Alysson & Löschke, Sandra. (2025). Towards circular renovation: a comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems. Building Research & Information, 53(3): 375–396. doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2024.2394470.
Madrazo, Leandro; Sicilia, Álvaro; Calvo, Adirane; Pascual, Jordi; Mont, Enric; Mylonas, Angelos & Iralde, Nadia. (2025). Retabit: A Data-Driven Platform for Urban Renewal and Sustainable Building Renovation. Energies, 18: 3895. doi.org/10.3390/en18153895.
Min, Byunghak; Shao, Jiangjiang & Oh, Jooseok. (2026). Building Form and Site Conditions for Sustainable Low-Carbon Design: Evidence from Building Energy Consumption in Seoul, South Korea. Sustainability, 18: 5489. doi.org/10.3390/su18115489.
Ożadowicz, Andrzej. (2025). Towards Sustainable Buildings and Energy Communities: AI-Driven Transactive Energy, Smart Local Microgrids, and Life Cycle Integration. Energies, 18: 5668. doi.org/10.3390/en18215668.
Pang, Jingshuai; Guo, Yi; Wang, Ruiqi; Chen, Hongyin; Wu, Zheng; Zhang, Manzheng & Li, Yuanfu. (2025). Optimization Design and Operation Analysis of Integrated Energy System for Rural Active Net-Zero Energy Buildings. Energies, 18: 3924. doi.org/10.3390/en18153924.
Piętocha, Anna & Koda, Eugeniusz. (2026). Sustainable Design and Energy Efficiency in Supertall and Megatall Buildings: Challenges of Multi-Criteria Certification Implementation. Energies, 19: 133. doi.org/10.3390/en19010133.
Radziejowska, Aleksandra & Bucoń, Robert. (2026). Renovation Decision Support System for Residential Buildings Based on the Analysis of Operational Documentation, BIM, and Machine Learning. Sustainability, 18: 3840. doi.org/10.3390/su18083840.
Sahebzamani, Erisasadat & Forcada, Núria. (2026). Enhancing sustainable construction decisions: integrating BIM and VR for circular economy assessment. Building Research & Information, 54(1): 79–99. doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2024.2449441.
Torabi, Mahsa & Evins, Ralph. (2024). Towards net‑zero carbon buildings: Investigating the impact of early‑stage structure design on building embodied carbon. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 30: 2374–2389. doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02287-w.
Walaa, Mohamed Metwally. (2025). Biomimicry and Green Architecture: Nature-Inspired Innovations for Sustainable Buildings. Sustainability, 17: 7223. doi.org/10.3390/su17167223.
Yaghmour, Abdulrahman; Yousry, Ahmed; Kaya, Hussein; Alowais, Ibrahim; Bahroun, Zied & Al-Assaf, Karam. (2025). Advancing Sustainable Material Selection in Construction: A Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8 (2): 663-683. doi.org/10.31181/dmame8220251583.
Yang, Yang; Zhang, Mingrui; Yao, Xunyu; Zhang, Menglong & Zhang, Yin. (2026). Spatial Translation and Material Coupling: A Synergistic Methodology for Driving the Sustainable Regeneration of Vernacular Architecture. Sustainability, 18: 1740. doi.org/10.3390/su18041740.
Yousif, Mohammed; Hayder, Gasim & Thiruchelvam, Sivadass. (2025). Green building rating systems comparative study and development methodology from global and local prospective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27: 5479–5524. doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04113-z.
Zajemska, Monika; Wojtyto, Dorota; Michalik, Joanna & Berski, Szymon. (2025). Review of Current Trends in Sustainable Construction. Energies, 18: 2559. doi.org/10.3390/en18102559.
Zhao, Zixin; Barbaresi, Alberto; Caggiu, Laura; Tassinari, Patrizia & Torreggiani, Daniele. (2026). Comparative Modeling of Greening Design Scenarios for Sustainable and Climate-Responsive Urban Regeneration: Microclimate and Thermal Comfort Effects in an Italian Case Study. Sustainability, 18: 3117. doi.org/10.3390/su18063117.
Zheng, Yuming; Wang, Kai-Hua; Moldovan, Nicoleta-Claudia; Mihit, Lavinia & Cristina, Nicolescu. (2026). Climate Policy Uncertainty and Renewable Energy Consumption: Multiple Insights from Digitization, Energy, and Innovation-Oriented Governance. Sustainability, 18: 5460. doi.org/10.3390/su18115460.
