by Jeffrey C Kadlowec, Architect

Abstract

Innovation remains important for the competitiveness of construction firms with growing demands on project managers and team members. Leaders must motivate and inspire employees to achieve common goals through communication and incentives. Compatibility within organizations is dependent upon the alignment of personnel with core principles and values. Project completion relies on trust, responsibility and accountability to navigate uncertainty and fragmentation. Project managers can delegate and empower individuals to improve performance and increase productivity. Successful construction enterprises exhibit social responsibility by serving public and private interests in a competitive marketplace. Unethical practices that arise from conflicts of interest should be prevented to avoid negative consequences. Leadership often prioritizes short-term gains by influencing behavior and attitudes, while responsibility, creativity and self-efficacy focuses on long-term relationships. Completing large complex projects require harmonious relations and psychological capital. Advanced societies monitor sustainable processes and implement strategies to improve performance and overall value. Emphasis on the natural environment over economic gains is necessary for a sustainable future.

Keywords:  leadership demands, organizational behavior, project management, social responsibility, sustainable development

Introduction to Organizational Culture

Innovation plays a critical role in enterprise competitiveness with great importance to the global construction industry. However, this industry remains traditionally conservative; project-based jobs and task-focused work hinder change and development. Individual creative behavior is often stifled by the interdependency of the work environment. With increasing uncertainty and limited project durations, leaders must recognize opportunities for innovation while adopting and implementing policies to incorporate greater diversity. Leadership should encourage and motivate employees toward achieving tasks and committing to goals. Project managers should be flexible enough to fill different roles, exert positive influence, and tackle various challenges. Team work is a crucial factor of success for project managers and a measure of their effectiveness. Adapting to a changing environment, exhibiting courage, and taking risks increase the impact of individuals and strengthens relationships (Zheng, 2019).

Transformational leadership has the ability to establish and encourage project teams towards common goals through short-term influence. Expressing adaptive styles through charismatic and inspirational behavior is essential in management of complex projects. Simpler projects are better addressed through transactional leadership to manage expectations, communicate specific requirements, and offer reward incentives (Zheng, 2019). Temporary organizations are more effective in the uncertain and changing conditions of complex projects, while permanent organizations can focus on efficiency in simpler or repetitive work.

Compatibility between people and organizations depends on congruency in values and goals which are internal constraints assessed through cognition and behavior. Organizational culture is the core principles shared by team members which must align with industry demands and social norms. Incongruent beliefs and behaviors lead to weak organizational culture and a low levels of leadership (Zheng, 2019). Project citizenship behavior (PCB), derived from organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has gained attention for its positive effect in reducing threats caused by high complexity and inherent uncertainty—promoting success in project management and improving overall performance. Organizational culture is a pattern of shared assumptions learned as a group through external adaptation and internal integration defined by four dimensions of individualism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity (Zhao, 2024). Interorganizational conflicts arise as confrontations involving interests between buyers and sellers regarding tasks and relationships. These involve disagreements over ideas and opinions about the work, or through emotional friction and personal incompatibility between entities. Furthermore, relationship conflicts between organizations more easily escalate into destructive processes than within intraorganizational ones.

Social responsibility is a willingness to serve the interests of people above personal interests. Construction enterprises tend towards this type of organizational culture, whether in the public or private sector, as successful implementation serves public interests and provides goods in place of the government. Much of the reward for participation is through recognition by society and realization of social value. Customer orientation reflects the degree an organization provides services and satisfies needs (Zhao, 2024). Construction remains a buyer’s market; winning customers is extremely competitive where sellers must provide high-quality services to best meet project needs. Customer-oriented service should focus on refined processes to achieve project performance to obtain recognition and revenue.

Complex Megaprojects and Off-Site Construction

Rapid urbanization and accelerated developments in technology have resulted in increasingly complex construction projects. These large scale, highly integrated projects are dynamic and uncertain with successful execution posing many challenges. The unique nature, difficulty of construction, and ambiguity in risk perception are compounded by lack of prior experience that presents significant obstacles. The global pandemic created unexpected condition, required adapting work environments, and resulted in less social interactions. Cost overruns, schedule delays, and overambitious goals can result in catastrophic implications (Luo, 2023). Leadership is essential to direct successfully project outcomes, and must guide team members to stimulate PCB. Increasing trust, improving coordination, and enhancing abilities leads to better overall performance.

Project value has routinely been improved and optimized for efficiency through contract compliance, rational behavior, and individual participation. Megaprojects are typically infrastructure improvements costing over $1 billion with lots of public attention and political interests due to impacts on communities. Contractors occasionally invest more time and resources on megaprojects without economic benefit to improve overall performance (Yang, 2018). Participants often compete to demonstrate quality and safety standards, innovative technologies, energy saving measures, sustainable methods, schedule adherence, support services, and PCB. Traditional models attempt to maximize utilization as a rational economic principle, while sustainable ones express altruism as the preferred method towards profit maximization.

Off-site construction (OSC) includes prefabricated buildings, unfinished prefab structures, and modular elements that are formed or assembled before being transported and installed on-site. Economies of scale make OSC suitable for residences, apartments, condominiums, and hotels. Efficient collaboration is crucial on construction projects and a critical element for success in OSC through the exchange of information between team members and utilization of shared resources (Xue, 2022). Though temporary partnerships are preferred for one-time delivery, joint ventures can establish long-term alliances to increase standardization and realize greater benefits.

Interdisciplinary tasks require organizational collaboration in OSC to bring a wide array of knowledge and a variety of skills from multiple trades. Integrated project delivery (IPD), engineering procurement (EPC), and design-build (D/B) are related methods that attempt to better coordinate the conventionally fragmented nature of subcontracting. Contracts define in-role behaviors and regulate formal relationship through rights and obligations to allocate risks through enforceable standards and reduce opportunistic behavior. Social networks and nonlinear relationship develop between project team members for the formal and informal exchange of information to achieve objectives through reciprocity and altruism (Xue, 2022).

Project Teams and Psychological Capital

Discretionary actions by individuals that improve project performance and not directly rewarded by formal means or contractual terms are considered interorganizational citizenship collaborative behavior (OCCB). Social exchange theory explains that indirect value is obtained on construction projects through strategic processes to develop long-term cooperation, build harmonious relationships, and provide peer learning. OCCB has gained popularity in being instrumental for mitigating risks, resolving disputes, and reducing overruns. Though project teams often lack OCCB, introducing social exchange approaches is essential to promoting this behavior (Xue, 2022). Transaction cost economic theory states that a contract stipulates collaborative work by project team members under terms and conditions to formulate promises and obligations in a functional manner. A practical governance approach improves interorganizational collaboration and reduces opportunistic behavior by allocating risks in control and coordination. Both relational social exchange and contractual social exchange are essential OCCB.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) addresses the myriad of problems resulting from construction activities including health and safety accidents, production of industrial waste, emission of greenhouse gases, and destruction of biodiversity (Su, 2023). Motivation theory suggest that motivation is the underlying force that drives human behavior. Prosocial motivation involves employee intentions to contribute for the organization, benefit the group, and help specific individuals. Promoting prosocial motivation enhances personal traits leading to desirable outcomes. CSR incorporates all activities and outcomes not pursuant of profit maximization through charitable donations, community development, environmental protection, and overall well-being of individuals. Mutual need for satisfaction, similarities and consistency between individuals and teams, and shared goals within an organization determine person-organization fit which builds trust, reduces conflicts, improves quality, and increases efficiency by encouraging interaction with greater contribution.

Large-scale construction projects require team members to maintain harmonious relationships over long durations. Psychological capital including self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience create positive impacts and lead to greater achievement (Su, 2023). These traits can be defined as confidence in ability to tackle challenges, a positive outlook on future success, persistence towards achieving goals, and perseverance when facing obstacles. Individuals with high self-efficacy tend to help, cooperate and share while exhibiting empathy and altruism. Optimism improves self-esteem and morale to create positive psychological experiences. Resilience aids in quicker recovery from adversity with greater responsibility towards leading and motivating others, while hope is the precious resource that maintains positive attitudes.

Trust, Satisfaction and Well-Being

Success in construction projects relies heavily on trust of interorganizational relationships to save time and reduce costs. Fragmentation and uncertainty throughout the industry have historically resulted in low levels of trust, responsibility and accountability. Contacts between owners and contractors stipulate how parties should act to establish cooperative relationships. However, different market positions, risk tolerance and resource allocation result in asymmetrical relations caused by speculative behavior that jeopardizes collaboration (Li, 2021). Unreasonable risk sharing, individual reputations, communication experience, performance goals, and project duration are main factors influencing the degree and variations in trust.

Interorganizational trust impacts performance and cooperation to maximize interests of the parties involved. Trust is perceived as the governing mechanism in collaboration through an emergent, dynamic and multilevel influence on performance and relevant outcomes. Perception of trustworthiness is based on expected behavior and deviations from expectations which are greatly dependent upon interactions with others. Strong interpersonal relationships establish reliability among members and prevent negative impacts, though trust in one party does not lead to the same from others. Trust asymmetry and imbalance of power are inevitable outcomes resulting from unequal levels in practice between organizations (Li, 2021). Though much attention is given to building trust, erosion of trust occurs more easily and to a greater level—damaging relationships and fragile positions. Thus, more caution is typically displayed by subordinates than from superiors concerned with organizational performance.

Effectiveness of PMs is determined by delegation, empowerment, accountability, role expectations, and goal alignment. The hierarchical structure in relationships between project managers (PMs) and top-level managers can lead to conflicts in power dynamic, decision authority, and resource allocation. Understanding this dynamic and its influences on organizational behavior is crucial in leadership intervention, job satisfaction, workplace enhancement and project outcomes. Adopting appropriate organizational behavior increases productivity and improves performance. In architecture, engineering and construction (AEC), supervisor and subordinate relationships benefit from feedback seeking behavior by acknowledging potential differences, directly soliciting feedback, and avoiding discomfort—thus boosting efficiency (Ling, 2024). Lack of motivation, insufficient information, and haphazard decision-making negatively influence production. Adopting integrated behavior in project management towards established goals through joint focus results in a significant positive impact on time, cost and quality. Empowering leadership behavior, team member development, and higher creative self-efficacy leads to innovation, while directive leadership can be detrimental.

Behavior, Commitment and Conflict

Cooperative development relies on favorable relationships between participants to facilitate collaboration for improving project performance and mitigate the negative effects of fragmentation in construction. Contractual agreements and governance mechanisms establish and manage interorganizational relationships. Increasing project complexity leads to unclear objectives, ambiguous scope, and undefined responsibilities; inducing opportunistic behavior. Marginal utility is gained through relational governance to promote cooperation and inhibit opportunistic behavior, though alternate means are essential as effectiveness can decrease progressively. Institutional performance theory argues that information exchange and risk sharing vary effectiveness in an evolving environment making exploration of boundary conditions necessary in private relationships (Li, 2024). Construction organizations should follow implicit rules and relational norms based on shared value and codes of conduct which constrain all parties.

Organizational commitment (OC) directly correlates with effective performance, job satisfaction, and low turnover by construction stakeholders. Alignment of personal values with organizational values (OV) is an indicator of how well an individual ‘fits’ within an organization (see Table 1). Differences in background, ethnicity and religion complicate situations and inevitably lead to conflicts on construction projects. Employees with low levels of interest and attributes incongruent with the value system create friction between personnel (Panahi, 2017).

Table 1. Personal and Organizational Values Related to Commitment (Panahi, 2017)

Conflict is defined as disagreement or opposition between people regarding needs, interests, ideas, beliefs, values, and goals. Values are concepts or beliefs ordered by importance regarding desired outcomes or preferred behavior (see Table 2), which can be grouped into four categories of 1) openness to change, 2) self-enhancement, 3) self-transcendence, and 4) conservative. Value conflicts negatively affect the OC of construction stakeholders and is a better predictor than characteristics or demographics. The effect of values on productivity and efficiency for construction projects has a significant effect in determined the success of an organizations (Panahi, 2017).

Table 2. Definitions of Motivational Types of Values (Panahi, 2017)

Unethical Behavior and Dark Side of Leadership

Construction teams face two primary constraints when driven to meet time, cost and quality targets for their projects while meeting strict requirements imposed by governing agencies, local communities, and environmental groups. Conflicting demands create tension between intended deliverables and stakeholder expectations, often incurring additional costs. This can lead to unethical pro-organizational behavior—compromising quality, failure to meet specifications, or publicizing non-implemented policies. The specialized nature and limited familiarity with the work hides that behavior until severe consequences emerge (Wang, 2025). Protecting the long-term value of a project, financial interests of the owners, and safety of the public remains imperative.

Leadership displays an influential role in shaping organizational behavior through a position of power over team member attitudes. Prioritizing short-term gains based on motivation and efficiency can lead to unethical practices due to the temporary nature of projects and intense performance pressure (Wang, 2025). Responsible leaders must focus on positive effects and long-term relationships through creativity and self-efficacy. Pro-organizational intentions should not be used to justify self-interest or as rationalization for violating ethical standards. Self-regulatory mechanisms typically inhibit unethical conduct; though moral detachment can enable it without feelings of stress or guilt.

Successful completion of construction projects relies heavily on compliance with ethical codes of conduct. Unethical practices engaged by individuals acting solely to benefit the interests of their organization can lead to negative consequences when faced with contractual obligations, schedule constraints, changing demands, and uncontrollable conditions. Difficulty meeting project requirements may lead team members towards unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) to achieve specific objectives (Lin, 2023). Misrepresenting progress, filing false reports, covering quality issues, ignoring safety concerns, and concealing code violations may bring short-term profits but with destructive impact as conflicts escalate, reputations are damaged, and injuries or accidents occur—all of which can result in project failure.

Adopting and Measuring Sustainability

Consumption of natural resources in business operations results in excessive pollution of the environment. Green development emphasizes the natural environment over social economy, attempting to solve the contradiction between protection and enterprise (Li, 2022). Construction output remains a significant portion of national economies and gross domestic output (GDP), increasing at unprecedented rates in developing counties through globalization. Greenhouse gas emission and water contamination pose serious threats by the construction industry that must maintain a balance between economic development and environmental protection.

Agent-based modeling (ABM) can simulate social and natural phenomena by the evolution of behavior through computer programming and to promote research in engineering systems and physical science. Game of life models predict the progress of organizational behavior in construction enterprises through computational experiments in green development and renewable materials. Studies in environmental regulation focus on institutional improvements to explore, compare and classify practical effects; and industrial clusters analyze competition and cooperation by geographical areas to determine differences and commonalities (Li, 2022). Adopting green practices promotes sustainable development and optimization of the environment, while unsustainable regulations inhibit expansion of green behavior.

Integrated and informed societies measure and monitor sustainable processes and organizational behavior utilizing tools and techniques that are constantly changing to improve those indicators. Rational approaches seek to standardize perceptions, interpretations and reactions related to organizational climate and culture by overall performance. Analysis of organizational behavior has led to publications in administration and psychology, with related studies in emotion at work and the effects of management on culture. Sustainability utilizes these findings for predicting and controlling behavior to improve process and increase competitiveness in the globalized market (Quelhas, 2019).

Diverse workforces, economic recession, and outsource employment present additional challenges that increase the importance of understanding organizational behavior. Application of concepts, tools and techniques are reflected in their results on business. Leadership styles and policies determine factors of change in an organization. These must align with the principles and values of that organization and be practiced in daily relations, regardless of the type and size of the organization (Quelhas, 2019). The emotional dimension is broad, abstract, and varies in intensity, consistency and duration; providing new perspectives in building organizational culture.

References

Li, Xiaoyu & Deng, Jiaojiao. (2024). The impact of cross-organizational private relationships on cooperative behavior in construction projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17 (3). DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-11-2023-0245.

Li, Xingwei; Li, Jingru; Huang, Yicheng; He, Jinrong; Liu, Xiang; Dia, Jiachi & Shen, Qiong. (2022). Construction enterprises’ adoption of green development behaviors: an agent-based modeling approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9 (244). doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01263-9.

Li, Yijing; He, Nan; Li, Huimin; Liu, Ziqi & Qi, Jianyun. (2021). Influencing factors on inter-organizational trust asymmetry behavior in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28 (1). DOI 10.1108/ECAM-05-2019-0256.

Lin, Sen; Chen, Siyu & Liu, Xun. (2023). The Dark Side of Empowering Leadership: How Empowering Leadership Affects Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior in Construction Projects. Buildings, 13. doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102640.

Ling, Florence Y Y & Yapary, Michelle. (2024). Impact of Leaders’ Organizational Behavior on the Satisfaction and Well-Being of Project Managers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40 (6). doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6133.

Lohne, Jardar & Drevland, Frode. (2024). Crime in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry—The Role of Subcontractors. Buildings, 14 (3352). doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113352.

Luo, Lan; Yang, Yue; Wu, Guangdong; Zheng, Junwei & Liu, Defa. (2023). Effects of Organizational Leadership on Project Citizenship Behavior and Management Performance in Complex Construction Projects. Buildings, 13 (1). doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010259.

Panahi, Babak; Moezzi, Elena; Preece, Christopher N & Wan Zakaria, Wan Normeza. (2017). Value conflicts and organizational commitment of internal construction stakeholders. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24 (4).  DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0006.

Quelhas, Adriane D; Filho, José R F; Neto, Julio V & Pereira, Valdecy. (2019). Model to Measure Adherence of Culture, Climate, and Organizational Behavior in a Construction Company. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35 (4). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000688.

Su, Wei & Hahn, Juhee. (2023). Psychological Capital and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of ConstructionWorkers: The Mediating Effect of Prosocial Motivation and the Moderating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility. Behavioral Sciences, 13 (12). doi.org/10.3390/bs13120981.

Wang, Zilun; Wang, Yingli & He, Qinghua. (2025). Too Much of a Good Thing? The Curvilinear Effect of Responsible Leadership on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior in Projects. Project Management Journal. doi.org/10.1177/8756972825140305.

Xue, Hong; Ling, Florence Y Y; Sun, Tao; Song, Yirou & Zheng, Junwei. (2022). Social Exchange Approaches to Promoting Inter-Organizational Citizenship Collaborative Behaviors in the Construction Project Team. Journal of Civil Engineering & Management, 28 (6). doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2022.16015.

Xue, Hong; Sun, Tao & Zheng, Junwei. (2022). Organizational Elements and Collaborative Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Off-Site Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148 (10). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002379.

Yang, Delei; He, Qinghua; Cui, Qingbin & Hsu, Shu-Chien. (2018). Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Construction Megaprojects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34 (4). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000614.

Zhao, Xiaoyu; Lu Wenxue & Liu, Bowen. (2024). How to Foster Project Citizenship Behavior in Construction Industry: Organizational Culture Matters. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71. doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3243309.

Zheng, Junwei; Wu, Guangdong; Xie, Hongtao & Li Hongyang. (2019). Leadership, organizational culture, and innovative behavior in construction projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12 (4). DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0068.